AMSEED American Seed Intelligence Platform
Trial performance

Mountain Fresh Plus: trial performance

What this variety did in 4 published field trials. These are observations of particular seasons in particular places, not properties of the seed, and each figure carries the evidence behind it.

indicative Comparable figures from more than one trial, across more than one place or season.

Measurements

Each row states its own evidence level. A page-level verdict does not make every figure on it equally strong, and the strongest measurement here does not lend its weight to the weakest.

MeasurementObservedEvidenceLevel
Cull rate 2.8-66 % 2 observations from 2 trials, 2009 the trials measured this differently, so the figures are reported as a spread rather than combined; reported as a spread across conditions rather than as one result. exploratory
Late Blight severity 47.3-85 % 2 observations from 2 trials, 2012-2013 one location. indicative
Fruit weight 9.0-11.1 oz 2 observations from 2 trials, 2009 the trials measured this differently, so the figures are reported as a spread rather than combined; reported as a spread across conditions rather than as one result. exploratory
Marketable yield 16,706-17,061 lb/ac 2 observations from 2 trials, 2009 the trials measured this differently, so the figures are reported as a spread rather than combined; reported as a spread across conditions rather than as one result. exploratory
Late Blight: disease progress (AUDPC) 1,058.1 index 1 observation from 1 trial, 2013 one trial, in one place in one season. limited
Total harvested 49,095 lb/ac 1 observation from 1 trial, 2009 one trial, in one place in one season. limited

No average is taken across trials. Ranges span what was observed, and where the trials measured differently or grew at different plant populations the figures are a spread across conditions rather than one population.

Where these came from

TrialYearSiteDesign
Fresh-Market Tomato Variety Performance in 2009 2009 Lexington, Kentucky randomized complete block
Yield and Income of Fall Staked Tomato Cultivars in Eastern Kentucky 2009 Quicksand, Kentucky not stated
Evaluation of Late Blight Resistant Tomato Varieties, 2012 2012 New York not stated
Evaluation of Late Blight Resistant Tomato Varieties, 2013 2013 New York not stated

Trial sources

Evidence: 4 sources, all independent references.

  1. Fresh-Market Tomato Variety Performance in 2009 · University of Kentucky College of Agriculture, Department of Horticulture (2009), University or Government
  2. Yield and Income of Fall Staked Tomato Cultivars in Eastern Kentucky · University of Kentucky College of Agriculture, Department of Horticulture (2009), University or Government
  3. Evaluation of Late Blight Resistant Tomato Varieties, 2012 · Cornell Long Island Horticultural Research and Extension Center (2012), University or Government
  4. Evaluation of Late Blight Resistant Tomato Varieties, 2013 · Cornell Long Island Horticultural Research and Extension Center (2013), University or Government